<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: Bang pro Euro – 1&#215;1 nach Keynes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carta.info/3227/bang-pro-euro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carta.info/3227/bang-pro-euro/</link>
	<description>Politik, Ökonomie, digitale Öffentlichkeit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:22:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Von: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://carta.info/3227/bang-pro-euro/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carta.info/?p=3227#comment-269</guid>
		<description>Mein Vorschlag: Geb&#252;hren f&#252;r die Geldhaltung, also eine Umlaufsicherungsgeb&#252;hr, anstatt die Schulden mit neuen Schulden zu bek&#228;mpfen!
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umlaufsicherung

Frau Merkel k&#246;nnte sich dann das Geld f&#252;r die Konjunkturprogramme sparen!

Prof. Dr. Willem Buiter und Prof. Dr. Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou haben dies bereits 2001 in dem Fachartikel  &quot;Liquidity traps: How to Avoid Them and How to Escape Them&quot; vorgeschlagen!

&quot;The second option is to lower the zero nominal interest rate floor on currency by
taxing currency. If a rule were followed that kept the nominal interest rate on currency
systematically below the nominal interest rate on non-monetary instruments, the economy
could never end up in a liquidity trap. Such a rule would require the authorities to be able to
pay interest, negative or positive, on currency, that is, to turn currency into Gesell money.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mein Vorschlag: Geb&#252;hren f&#252;r die Geldhaltung, also eine Umlaufsicherungsgeb&#252;hr, anstatt die Schulden mit neuen Schulden zu bek&#228;mpfen!<br />
<a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umlaufsicherung" rel="nofollow">http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umlaufsicherung</a></p>
<p>Frau Merkel k&#246;nnte sich dann das Geld f&#252;r die Konjunkturprogramme sparen!</p>
<p>Prof. Dr. Willem Buiter und Prof. Dr. Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou haben dies bereits 2001 in dem Fachartikel  &#8220;Liquidity traps: How to Avoid Them and How to Escape Them&#8221; vorgeschlagen!</p>
<p>&#8220;The second option is to lower the zero nominal interest rate floor on currency by<br />
taxing currency. If a rule were followed that kept the nominal interest rate on currency<br />
systematically below the nominal interest rate on non-monetary instruments, the economy<br />
could never end up in a liquidity trap. Such a rule would require the authorities to be able to<br />
pay interest, negative or positive, on currency, that is, to turn currency into Gesell money.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

